Pages

February 16, 2010

An unlikely hero’s journey! My Name is Khan



When Joseph Campbell wrote his "Hero with a Thousand Faces" in 1949, it inspired many a heroic journey on celluloid, including the Star Wars trilogy and the Matrix series! Campbell's archetypal hero was based on the many mythic heroes, and their journey was divided by him into three phases - departure (or separation), initiation (or journey/adventure) and return (in triumph of course!). The hero was heroic, noble, skilled and born into the role, and his journey was usually into an alien world, involved many travails, "dragons" slayed, and when he did return triumphant, he usually had a boon that could change the world he was a part of. This hero type has been seen over and over again in Hindi cinema too.

Then of course there are unlikely heroes. They are neither to the manor born, nor equipped to be heroes. These heroes have occupied the realm of fantasy for ever. J R R Tolkein's Lord of the Rings trilogy, Stephen Donaldson's Lord Foul's Bane, and more then ever before, Donaldson's A Dark and Hungry God Arises (The Gap Trilogy), all have most unlikely heroes whose destiny never included becoming a hero but they just happened to chance on circumstances that began their separation, initiation and eventual triumphant return to a better world. In The Gap Trilogy the hero is a most villainous and brutal man who by the end of the tale has become an unlikely hero.

Strangely enough then, our myths and fantasies differ remarkably in the hero archetype. It is not surprising that Director Karan Johar and Scriptwriter Shibani Bathija use the fantasy archetype to design their unlikely hero in My Name is Khan. We have seen a similar heroic journey in the Hollywood epic Forrest Gump, that tells of the challenged man Forrest, his separation as he joins the military, his heroic journey through troubled times and his numerous, often verging on unreal, triumphs as he returns back to his dreams. Forrest's journey is not a linear one, and shows him as an unlikely hero in numerous situations. And while the journey is larger than life (including Forrest single-handedly saving an entire battalion), the return is simple in comparison, he is recognized a war hero, gets to buy his shrimp boat, and also has the love of his life come back to him (before she dies of unstated causes). KHAN follows a similar though much simpler graph. A mentally challenged (though NOT low IQ) man is the unlikely hero here. Unlike GUMP his journey is more clearly divided into separation as his carefully collected family falls apart, the initiation is a simpler one - that of a bewildered man who is mistaken for a trouble maker, and yet he comes through many a situation touching the lives of people he meets in simple and poignant ways, and eventually he is able to achieve his simple (though fantastical) goal after a triumph (while necessary in the hero's journey, yet this is stagey and not quite real), and can return to gather back the pieces of his life while having made a small difference (however transient it may be) in how people perceive the ones who are not the same as them.

This theme of the "others" or profiling was last explored in District 9, and there too it was done in a very unsubtle and in your face way in the beginning (deliberately so), and then slowly the overt differences morphed into a realization of the inherent similarities that bind all living beings. KHAN is hardly subtle at all in the telling of the tale, tells it in a flamboyant in your face manner. What is subtle is the fact that we view it through the prism of an unlikely and reluctant hero.

Rizvaan Khan (Shah Rukh Khan) is an Apserger's afflicted man who has embarked on a journey to meet the president of the USA. WHY? Towards the end we see a man watching TV in his living room, asking - why do they keep asking him why? Why not? Is it not OK for a resident of a country to try and meet the president? This explains partly the simplicity of the need to meet the president. He is the president, and one should be able to meet him if one wants. For this simple one track minded soul, his way back to his family involves meeting the president and telling him something - that his name is Khan and he is NOT a terrorist!

This story is non-linear, jumping between times and gradually unfolds the events behind the journey. This parallels the lack of focus usually seen in Asperger's (and indeed autism spectrum) patients when it comes to normal day to day matters. But it is matched with an obsessive focus on some things to the exclusion of others. Thus Khan obsesses over details about places, things, the products his brother asks him to sell door to door at salons. But he cannot prevaricate and so always tells them the real truth about each product! This endears him to the salon owner Mandira (Kajol in a strong emotion packed performance), and they keep meeting. Eventually Mandira allows Rizwaan into her life and that of her son Sam. The happy family is torn apart after 9/11 and an upswelling of resentment against Muslims. And out of rage and hysteria in the aftermath of the breakup arises a simple fact for Rizwaan - things can get back to normal if only he can meet the President and tell him that he is NOT a terrorist!

The script goes from uplifting to a unbelievable in some parts of the film. Whether this is by design, to create a "heroic" moment and make a journey of mythic proportions, is hard to tell. Certainly it makes for some seriously funky moments in the film as a hurricane hits rural Georgia (yes hurricanes can hit Georgia, it does border the Gulf Coast!). However, this plot device, and Rizvaan's role in help being mobilized to the beleaguered town, is important for the hero's journey to conclude and for him to return with a boon. In this case the boon is the love of Mandira, and a slightly more aware world as in the public eye Rizvaan has become an unlikely hero who is not to be judged by his name alone.

Performances in the film are top notch. The crowning performance comes from Shah Rukh Khan as the Asperger's syndrome afflicted Rizvaan Khan. The performance is set up with a masterly turn by Tanay Chaddha as the young Rizvaan. His literal take on anything said to him (Jhakh maaro ja kar) presages the quest to meet the president by the adult Rizvaan. The intelligent though emotionally detached child is nurtured well by his mother (Zareena Wahab), and the two together have some fine moments on screen. The younger brother grows up to be Jimmy Sheirgill, and he gets little screen time to do much, but still is very good in the role of the resentful brother. Upon moving to the US he marries Sonia Jehan, and here we see an excellent portrayal by Sonia of the empathetic sister-in-law who understands Rizvaan's problem. As Mandira, Kajol shines in the role of mother, lover. Her magical interactions with the emotionally remote Rizwaan form the mainstay of the first half of the film. Some interactions of note are when Rizvaan finally asks her to cut his hair - it is the closest to emotionally physical interaction that he can think of, and then when she finally proposes and he hides his face and giggles, magic is made. Kajol as a mature woman, a mother who still manages to create some magic in romantic moments on screen. She is the last of our acting leading ladies, after this we have the beauty queen parade. She can be hyper and yet also immensely quiet and grave and her eyes inspired two songs in the film - and rightly so!! Is it time for her to retire? She is our Meryl Streep, so hell no! Finally some lesser roles must be mentioned. Arjun Mathur plays the catalyst - an idealistic university student who sets things in motion so that Khan's goal can be achieved and his goodness come to the fore. Parveen Dabbas as the TV anchor has a significant role and he is good in it, as is Vinay Pathak in a brief cameo as a motel owner! The foreign actors are all decent and not caricatures. Which brings me to the two African American characters in the small village in Georgia. Was that reasonable? A quick check tells me that Georgia is second from the bottom in rural poverty, so it is not unimaginable. And they are famous for their Southern hospitality, though it may not extend the length of buying our hero a man's clothing while his clothes are washed! He ends up wearing Mama's pinafore for a bit, and if you do not like that, I say I prefer that to his going around in a blanket or buck naked!

The screenplay does do some fast and loose with facts but in the end it serves the purpose of the film pretty well. There are aspects that may seem a trifle incongruous, but the work in the narrative and are not major deal breakers. Would people plot Jihad in a mosque?

Read more HERE

18 comments:

author said...

Pardesi

Very well-written.Could have been better had you elucidated a bit more on the weaknesses(in case you found one!)Seems like you loved every bit of the movie.SRK,as was anticipated through the promos,has received universal acclaim for his role.

One concern @ one point in your review:

"? A man like Rizvaan no doubt would be part husband part child-like in the relationship.. ........., not a loving spouse, and being a parent came first."

If kajol saw rizwan as her child(almost) why would she launch a diatribe on her "own son" owing to the death of another?especially on religious grounds!Its difficult to assimilate this action of hers.

The Illusionist said...

Pardesi - Thanks for sharing the review. I will watch the movie and get back to your review. I am afraid that there might be spoilers in the review.

Minnie said...

Pardesi- Awesome review! Mostly agree with everything you've said about this movie...Loved your drawing a parallel between the non-linear story-telling to the lack of focus in Asperger's patients...never saw it that way before!

Hope the movie gets the box office success it deserves! Otherwise, what will be the hope for lesser known stars/directors to recover their costs after making an honest movie with a great message ?

oldy said...

Great review.

The scene set in the mosque is not as unreal as it seems like. I have seen a discovery channel documentary about the story of each 9/11 terrorist. One of it is a story of an engineer from a family of moderate muslims who travelled to US for post graduation. Apparently, he got under the influence of fundamentalist after hearing hate speech from a jehadi recruiter in a mosque in US. He later got trained in Afghanistan. So, some research has been done by the makers.

Pardesi said...

Hey oldy - good to see you here, welcome to RL!

Thanks for your comment, I did not know about that incident! Yes, research was done for this film and it shows in a lot of places.

Pardesi said...

Thanks for your comments Manoj. It is a bit complicated but let me try to articulate my thoughts!

1. Rizvaan is like Mandira's spouse+child as he is a special needs person. Why does she marry him? I think his love for her. inherent goodness, sincerity, and the fact that her son connects to him (museum outing). BUT Sam is her own blood, her child that she bore from her own womb. That is a bond that is like no other and losing a young child can render one irrational. Everything she does is flawed and irrational after Sam's death.

2. Flaws? I wish I could say the film was flawless! It was 20 minutes too long, it could have had more emotional moments (though I preferred the dry style of story-telling), and the hurricane scene was a big issue for me. I can see that the journey had to end on a heroic note, but I had issues with how it was filmed. If they had taken away ALL long shots and made it intimate and claustrophobic, it would ave looked and felt more real.

author said...

Thanks for the reply pardesi :)

But if one is to believe your case presented in #1 ,it doesnt boast much about mandira's character much - blaming an innocent "child" for the death of her son ;that too on religious grounds.As a result,one loses sympathy with her character.

Pardesi said...

Manoj - what a person does in the throes of extremely tragic loss can only be comprehended by those who have gone through such an event. I think that is what is to be kept in mind. As for Mandira, I think nowhere do the makers imply that she and her son converted to Islam (Mandiar is shown to practice her faith), they changed their last name to the new husband's. And this was Mandira's decision, so a lot of it is self guilt too. In essence events happened as people though her son was a Muslim because of his last name.

Pitsie said...

This is one of the most biased reviews i have read.. never mind i forgot it is by a fangirl, who cannot see beyond SRK's nose..hahaha

Minnie said...

@Pitsie
We do not use offensive tone to get our opinions across on this blog...Could it be because we have opinions that can actually stand on their own merit?

Anonymous said...

Re.-we have opinions that can actually stand on their own merit?

Really, ah that is why the same fan girl who is ready to ignore all the faults in the scripts of MNITrashCan went after 3I and all its even minor flaws with a lot of Vengeance.

Pardesi said...

Pitsie and Anon - yes we do have opinions and we state them without being badgered or without badgering. Please feel free to state your opinions of the film or the review/s (of MNIK or 3 Idiots) and it will be heard and you will NOT be abused. But future ad hominem attacking posts will be deleted so as to not vitiate the atmosphere on the blog and turn it into an IndiaFM forum.

Thanks for stopping by and if you have an opinion we are all willing to listen.

MODERATOR said...

Pitsie and Anonymous,

Please note that opinions on posters will be deleted in the future. Opinions on films, reviews are most welcome.

Minnie said...

@Anonymous
"Really, ah that is why the same fan girl who is ready to ignore all the faults in the scripts of MNITrashCan..."

Pardesi- "Flaws? I wish I could say the film was flawless! It was 20 minutes too long, it could have had more emotional moments (though I preferred the dry style of story-telling), and the hurricane scene was a big issue for me. I can see that the journey had to end on a heroic note, but I had issues with how it was filmed."

Hardly the thoughts of a fangirl!

As far as 3I is concerned, what could be minor flaws for some could be major for some others. After all, your choice in cinema at the end of the day is very subjective!

@Pardesi- People should know that Ad hominem abusive tactic is by itself totally fallacious by nature...

Nia said...

>>Really, ah that is why the same fan girl who is ready to ignore all the faults in the scripts of MNITrashCan went after 3I and all its even minor flaws with a lot of Vengeance.<<

OMG, how dare someone point out flaws in the movie of the century called 3 Idiots? What would we have done without your precious input? We thank you from the bottom of our hearts for giving such intellectual criticism of someone's personal thoughts on a movie.

Give yourself a prize for correcting the wrongs of the world with such Vengeance. (capitalized especially for you.. you seem to like this word. :P )

Nia said...

Welcome Jeevcy! I didn't know you missed me so much, sweetie!! Now be brave and come with the ID everyone knows and don't hide like a coward.

Why are you so insecure about the midget mamu that you're tracking down blogs with positive reviews of MNIK? Personality flaw? Corrupting NG's Sb was not enough for you?

One bit of advice: Go back to Indiafm and prosper among your type....you know, the ones with below 80 IQs. Thank you and have a wonderful Aamiry day, darling. :D

Sorry guys for the digression... go back to discussing the movie now.

The Illusionist said...

Princess in on a roll... Keep it coming P :-)

The Illusionist said...

@Pitsie ad @Anon

Let's focus our comments on the post, not on the commentator or the poster.

Art & Cinema in particular is very subjective, and people's opinions differ. So please state your opinion and let it stand on its merits.

Post a Comment