Pages

July 8, 2010

Da.One - Don 2 and Ra.one sold for impossible to recover prices?



A whopping amount of Rs 300 crore is riding on Shah Rukh Khan’s next two films, RA.One and Don 2

Agreed, Bollywood has lost crores this year because a lot of expensive films failed to retrieve their expected turnovers (Blue, of course, stands apart for its sheer wastage of money). But the biggest production companies seem to have blind belief in films that star Shah Rukh Khan. Nearly Rs 300 crore is riding on King Khan’s shoulders.



Newsflash: Reliance Big Pictures has not hit rock bottom with the poor turnover of the Abhishek Bachchan and Aishwarya Rai starrer Raavan. Neither has Hrithik Roshan and Barbara Mori’s Kites debacle at the box office obstructed their soaring fund levels.

The buzz in the trade is that Reliance Big Pictures has bought the rights of Don 2 from Excel Entertainment for Rs 125 crore, which is about Rs 25 crore more than what they purchased Kites for. The deal has taken place even before Don 2 has gone on the floors, which implies that even in today’s times when films are flopping days after their release, the buyers in the market have extreme faith in a film that has Shah Rukh playing the lead.

Added to this is, there is talk in the industry of Eros International buying Shah Rukh’s home-production RA.One for a whopping Rs 175 crore.

A leading distributor says, “Shah Rukh rocks. He is still one of the top three stars in this country. His film guarantees good returns. Yes, Reliance Big Pictures has bought Don 2 for an amount which is definitely more than Rs 100 crore. But I think that Shah Rukh’s deal with Eros International on RA.One could be a funding proposal, which implies that Shah Rukh can still sell the film to other buyers.”

Even trade analysts in the film industry seem to second this view. A leading trade-analyst says, “I am unaware of the exact figures between Red Chillies Entertainment and Eros International, but I know that Shah Rukh is asking for at least Rs 150 crore for RA.One, wherein he has used some top-notch technicians to take his project to a very high level.”

Priti Shahani, chief strategy and marketing officer of Reliance Big Pictures confirmed, “It’s true that we have Don 2 in our slate of films for next year, but there is no truth in the purchase price that is being speculated in the market.”

An official from Eros International also confirmed that their latest purchase is RA.One, while refusing to reveal the exact terms and conditions of the agreement.

Sunil Lulla (President, Eros International), Amit Khanna (CEO, Reliance Big Pictures), Ritesh Siddhwani (Excel Entertainment) and Shah Rukh Khan remained unavailable for comment.

Currently, Shah Rukh is busy shooting for RA.One. As soon as he completes it, he’ll start work on Don 2, which co-stars Priyanka Chopra and Arjun Rampal. And all this hard work does indeed pay off. And how!

LINK

Granted it is Mumbai Mirror (and Vicky Lalwani) and could be complete fabrication, but not good news if it is true. The logic might have been that if MNIK could almost recover 95 cr as a serious film, maybe entertainers will be huge. BUT the non-traditional overseas market that MNIK tapped was very niche and I doubt those people will come out for Ra.one and Don 2.

July 7, 2010

Lafangey Parindey promo!



Looks very interesting, and it is great that we will get to see Piyush Mishra acting!

Gal Meethi Meethi Bol - Aisha



Youth power zindabad! I Hate Luv Storys a success



The writing is clear on the wall: The youth holds the key to success. A film starring a fresh pair, exceptional music and remarkable promotion can entice and lure viewers to cineplexes. That, in a nutshell, explains the terrific opening weekend business of I HATE LUV STORYS. Of course, you cannot overlook the marvellous contribution by Karan Johar and UTV, two names that are synonymous with qualitative cinema. They ensured that the film was talked-about and more than visible prior to its release.

It was a foregone conclusion that I HATE LUV STORYS would open very well at the ticket window. The rom-com radiated the right vibes and like most Karan Johar movies, the urban audience/multiplex junta was expected to give a warm reception to the film.

If you scrutinize the business of I HATE LUV STORYS, you'd realize that the metros and centres with plexes have contributed around 85% to 90% of its business. The contribution by the youth is overwhelming. The single screens haven't reacted well, but let's not forget that a film with an English title and classy treatment finds it difficult to penetrate into smaller centres or the mass-dominated belt. The Salman Khan starrer WANTED, a hardcore masala film, reaped a harvest from single screens, while MAIN AUR MRS. KHANNA, starring the same actor, was not only rejected at urban centres, but also single screens and mass-dominated areas.

Monday being Bharat Bandh, the plexes/single screens resumed screenings from evening shows onwards. Of course, the business was severely affected, but the general consensus is that the film will remain steady on weekdays and also in its second weekend at metros.

What goes in its favour is its economics. The film was made in a moderate budget and sold to UTV for an equally nominal price [Rs. 18 cr.; excluding P. & A.], who in turn sold the film to various territory distributors. Karan has recovered his investment, UTV too recovered the money invested in the film and made profits before its release and with a terrific start on hand, the territory distributors have won half the battle. The nominal costs on one hand and the excellent shares from plexes on the other should ensure a quick recovery for the buyers. In fact, everyone associated with I HATE LUV STORYS -- the producers, the principal distributor and the territory distributors -- is likely to earn from it, which is quite a rarity in today's times.

The title may be I HATE LUV STORYS, but the makers and distributors are chanting a different tune post its release: 'We luv luv storys'.

LINK

Brand Bachchan - A myth?



Bachchans are a brand.

For close to half a decade, an unsuspecting audience, consumer world as well as media has been fed with this statement on a frequent basis. If one looks at it on the face value, they truly are. After all there is no other family belonging to the world of glamour in the entire world that has got the head of affairs being a living legend, a son being an actor who has been around for a full decade and has at least five bona fide hits under his belt and a daughter-in-law for a beauty queen who has established her clout and proved her mettle as an actor for a decade. Bring them all together and the package is bound to create a frenzy amongst those who wish to churn this brand to the fullest.

But how much does this brand really hold true if one looks at the individualistic performance of these three names that are unarguably the most known in the world of films? Of course there are endorsements, appearances, shows and other public events that keep them all in news for weeks at stretch. But how about movies, the platform that has enabled the three to become the super family of Bollywood? Looking at the box office duds that have been delivered by the trio over the years gone by, it requires a quick look at the state of affairs.

In the current decade itself, Bachchans have been an integral part of at least one big box office debacle practically every year. Yes, every year since 2001 till today!

No, by the debacles here, no one is demeaning the good work that they have done in the past, present or future. After all Amitabh Bachchan doesn't require anyone to talk in his defence, Abhishek has had movies like Guru, Dhoom series, Sarkar, Yuva and of course Bunty Aur Babli to prove that he is definitely not a pushover. As for Aishwarya Rai, she has maintained certain sophistication to the state of affairs and has quite a few biggies lined up that would keep her stocks on.

But is this an invincible brand? Not quite, if one looks at the journey that these actors have taken.

Of course no actor is without his or her share of flops, even disasters. The biggest and the smallest actors in a film industry in any part of the world would vouch for that. However, the aura which has been created around the trio is something that does make one start wondering if all of this is indeed worth it? Are audiences being led to believe (via a smartly put together approach) that the family here belongs to a planet which is out of this world?

Or is it just a myth?

Let's look at the decade gone by and decide for ourselves!

2010

Raavan has done a huge damage for Bachchans not just as actors who were waiting for an elusive hit but also individuals. While Abhishek has never received flak belonging to this scale ever before, Aishwarya has still managed to go scot-free. However, ironically it is Amitabh Bachchan who has been caught in the middle of all the fire, courtesy his impulsive emotional outburst, post the debacle of the film.

Another release starring a Bachchan, Teen Patti, stays on to be one of the biggest botched up films of the actor's career. The film stays on to be a huge commercial failure of 2010 and also an engagement that even Amitabh Bachchan wouldn't be quite proud of.

2009

Aladin was a huge commercial disappointment of 2009. Starring Amitabh Bachchan as 'Genie - The Genius', the film saw quite some flak coming for the Senior Bachchan. Too long in the making, the film was not even given an opportunity to make any choice, let aside being rejected, and the result was a box office failure. For Amitabh Bachchan, this was a huge setback since he featured in the film in an author backed role.

For son Abhishek too, 2009 didn't quite start off well, what with Delhi 6 turning out to be one of the biggest disappointments of the year. Hyped beyond expectations, especially since it had Rakesyh Omprakash Mehra coming behind the camera after Rang De Basanti, Delhi 6 was ridiculed by most and saw a big slump in collections after a good opening. The film's disappointment hurt Bachchans a lot since it was a solo starrer for Abhishek.

2008

Prior to Delhi 6, Abhishek Bachchan had a disaster called Drona haunting him. The VFX laden fantasy saga seemed doomed right from the time the promos came on air. Despite the presence of Priyanka Chopra, audience made up their mind to skip Drona, hence giving it a cold shoulder once it arrived. An overall poor product further meant that Drona didn't find any good voice coming it's way.

In the same year Amitabh Bachchan too had an unsung The Last Lear failing to make any impact at the box office. Though his performance was critically acclaimed (by those select few people from media who actually caught only the film during it's festival or press screenings), audience in general was oblivious of the film even arriving at theaters. Zero marketing, poor release and zilch awareness means that The Last Lear proved to be one of the least known films starring a Bachchan.

2007

Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag - Need one actually say more? Senior Bachchan would truly understand what Junior is currently going through for Raavan. After all what is happening now is just an action replay of the 2007 fiasco when Amitabh decided to get into Gabbar's shoes. Result? The tag of 'biggest disaster of not just the current year but at least the decade' being bestowed upon it. The film was a commercial, critical and emotional disaster for everyone involved and is a butt of jokes for many, including Ram Gopal Varma himself, till date.

Abhishek had his own disappointment to be worried about, what with his much hyped Jhoom Barabar Jhoom fizzling out no sooner than the moment it hit the screens. Neither was the plot accepted by the audience nor did the narrative find an appreciation, something which resulted in this Yash Raj production turning out to be one of the biggest setbacks of the year. The songs were hit but that couldn't help Jhoom Barabar Jhoom from sinking. Further embarrassment came from the fact that Rajnikanth's Sivaji which released alongside went on to do bumper business even in Mumbai that only rubbed salt on the wound.

2006

This was the year that saw Abhishek Bachchan coming together with Aishwarya Rai, well even in real life. While love bloomed on the sets of Umrao Jaan, the final product was such that it toppled someone as big as J.P. Dutta out of business for long. Close to half a decade has gone by but Dutta hasn't been able to recover from the film's calamity. A huge disaster of the year for the Bachchan couple, it is one red in their Bollywood report card that is difficult to be erased.

For Aishwarya Rai, there was double trouble actually, what with her effort in the West, The Mistress of Spices, finding an all around ridicule for itself. Clearly a badly made product, the film was as spice-less as it could have been and was rejected in East as well as West.

2005

Amitabh Bachchan had decided to help his friend Romesh Sharma when it came to launching his son in Dil Jo Bhi Kahey. A long in the making film, it turned out to be a disastrous affair at the box office. Releasing without much fanfare, it featured Amitabh Bachchan in a lengthy role but audience were still not enticed enough. Result was a total rejection where not many even bothered to check out the film in theaters. A film that would have been forgotten by Bachchan himself by now.

For Aishwarya Rai too, the year brought it with some disappointment as her Shabd turned out to be one of the major flops of the year. An abstract theme coupled with a terrible movement in the film's narrative meant that despite a good act, Aishwarya had to suffer with a flop under her belt.

2004

This was a year when irony was at its worst for Abhishek Bachchan. His Yuva is still considered to be his best ever act till date. While the film is being revisited time and again and often compared to be a far better affair than Ratnam's Raavan and Dil Se, the fact is that on its release Yuva was panned by many. Also, it was a major flop at the box office as not just did it fail to take an opening, it didn't even see much word of mouth coming its way despite an all star studded cast.

For Aishwarya too there was disappointment galore as her off screen romance with Vivek Oberoi failed to translate into anything magical on screen in Kyun! Ho Gaya Naa. The film was panned by one and all and audience too gave it a royal miss. What promised to be a spicy saga on screen turned out to be a damp squib, hence turning out to be a much ignored affair. Incidentally, Amitabh Bachchan too featured in this film that has long ago been forgotten.

2003

This was the time period when Abhishek Bachchan was struggling hard. Really hard. He was in need of a hit, something that was eluding him for long. A rustic attempt like Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost promised something exciting for Abhishek but that didn't turn out to be the case as the film failed at the box office. There were just no takers for this film despite Lara Dutta adding on to the glamour quotient.

Meanwhile for Amitabh Bachchan, there were two releases this year which were embarrassing to say the least. Boom was an epic vulgar disaster that happens only once in a decade and it was totally out of question for Amitabh Bachchan's fans to give it a nod of approval after they saw it. To begin with, they gave the film a rousing reception, courtesy some striking visuals and three striking babes. However, the word of mouth was out and out negative on the first day itself, something that pushed the film out of business before first week came to a close. Fact One: Katrina Kaif made her debut with this film. Fact Two: This is one of the only 2-3 flops that she has given in her career so far.

2002

This was the year when each of the three Bachchans had a disappointment to their names. Amitabh and Aishwarya came together for Hum Kisi Se Kam Nahin, the most unsung movie ever coming from the house of David Dhawan. While Dhawan was having a golden run with Govinda and Salman Khan till then, he opted for Amitabh Bachchan and Ajay Devgn for this film. The film was not just one of the most ignored multi starrer of the year (it also starred Sanjay Dutt), it failed to find any mention even in the years after that.

Meanwhile, Abhishek Bachchan was trying his luck with friends and agreed to feature in Guruduv Bhalla's debut film Sharaarat. It also turned out to be his last as the film found total rejection coming its way. A disaster at the box office, it is also the least talked about. No wonder, the film isn't even been seen on home video as its DVDs never hit the stands.

2001

If one looks at the directorial debut of Rakesyh Omprakash Mehra, Aks, one can well say that life came full circle for him and Bachchans with Delhi 6. When released, Aks had huge hype preceding it. The film opened well too but the moment negative word of mouth started spreading, there was only downfall that followed. One of the most criticized films of the year, it did feature Amitabh Bachchan in an author backed role but was way ahead of it's times.

For son Abhishek too, there were demons to fight as his Bas Itna Sa Khwaab Hai didn't find any takers. This was the time period when Abhishek was desperately trying to find a foot in the industry and nothing really was working for him. The debacle of Bas Itna Sa Khwab Hai only added to his woes.

http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/slideshow/2010/07/05/663/index.html
http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/slideshow/2010/07/07/666/index5.html

‘Films live beyond first weekend’



Rahul Parzania Dholakia on why he chose to go Kashmir after Gujarat, big after small

After making a film with Naseeruddin Shah and Sarika, why did you choose to do a movie with Sanjay Dutt and Bipasha Basu?

The main reason being the film on Kashmir is much bigger than the film on Gujarat. The scale is bigger. To achieve that you need to have a big budget, more than what we had for Parzania. Also, I didn’t want to again face the problems I had with distribution during Parzania. You want people to see the film. Plus Parzania was a personal story. I didn’t want to compromise on the film on any level and so I produced it myself. It was a very emotional drama. Lamhaa is more engrossing and more thrilling. It’s low on emotions and high on drama. I didn’t want to repeat another Parzania. All these factors led to me deciding to cast mainstream actors. Maybe you pay a price for it but you also get a lot of advantages from that.

What prompted you to make a film on Kashmir?

Actually it was a group of students who said that Kashmir is a beautiful prison. I wanted to see it for myself. I went to the Valley and experienced things myself. I also did around 150 interviews there... from army officers to separatist leaders to common people. I got hooked on to it. The problem is that there are so many incidents and so many stories, you don’t know which one to tell. That’s where the time actually goes.

From Roja to Mission Kashmir to ...Yahaan, Kashmir has been depicted on the Bollywood screen every few years. Have you shown a different Valley in Lamhaa?

Very different from those films. Though there is an angle of militancy, though there is an angle of action and drama, I think the way we have told the story of Kashmir is very different. There are many human stories we have shown that no one has seen before in India. Even a simple line like “Aap Hindusthan kab ja rahe ho?” says a lot about how Kashmir is separated from India in people’s minds there.

How difficult was it to shoot there?

Initially it was extremely difficult because we went in and shot when the state was under emergency and there was no government in place. Gradually the drive of the whole unit and the passion for making this film overcame a lot of things. In restrospect I think, damn, we shouldn’t have done something so risky. I wanted to shoot in places where no one has shot before. I shot in downtown Srinagar, I shot in Sopore, I shot in Jama Masjid. I remember while shooting in Sopore four guys from Lashkar had come down just to see what we were doing. Any time there could have been a grenade launch. So to shoot in such places, to get the expression of actors, to get the right lighting... it was incredibly challenging! There was no chance of a retake or a reshoot.


Did you have to cast Sanjay Dutt because his friend Bunty Walia was producing Lamhaa?

No, Sanjay Dutt liked the story. The character is about 45-50 in age. He’s an officer who is coming back to the Valley after 18 years. I needed that maturity in the person. Also, Sanjay Dutt’s personality is such that he has been associated with Kashmir for 30-40 years, ever since his childhood. He has seen the journey of Kashmir, he has seen both the pain and conflict. It was more of a choice of a personality taking on the character rather than just taking a guy who looks good for the role.

The same with Bipasha. Her character has to portray internal and external conflicts... very physical and very agile and at the same time she is someone who has been humiliated and beaten up. As a personality Bipasha is such. Physically she is active and fit. For me it’s not about the stereotypical looks of a person. Bipasha is not a Kashmir ki kali. Her personality drove me to cast her.

Despite such a mainstream cast, do you think the audience will come to watch a subject like Lamhaa in the first weekend?

Quite honestly, when you have made a film for three years and been in life and death situations where you could have been shot so many times, you really don’t care about the box-office fate of the film. The journey itself has been fulfilling. You want the success of the film because you want a greater number of people to watch the film. But you are not afraid of failure. People will eventually watch a good film. Cinema’s life is longer than Friday, Saturday, Sunday. The first weekend is for things like actors getting more films and producers making more movies.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100707/jsp/entertainment/story_12652923.jsp

July 4, 2010

Show us a film, we’ll show you the money




Bollywood has never been more confused as now. Never been more unsure about the big stars/big film formula. Does this mean the movie game will change? Who and what will be the game-changer? Our correspondent talks to the biggest players about their hunt for that elusive thing: an idea that connects
Were you one of those who went into mourning when Hrithik Roshan donned a sombrero and salsa-ed his way out of our hearts in Kites, this year’s worst mega film till now? Despite having Hearthrob Hrithik, the film was old and stodgy, a good idea killed by lousy execution. Did you send a prayer to the gods that govern Bollywood, giving eternal thanks to the unsleazy sunshine shed by India’s first all-digital film Love Sex aur Dhokha? Despite having no celebrated faces, LSD was cool and groovy, finally unshackling sex and freeing love, reaching out to a young and restless audience that is changing at breakneck speed with each tweet.
The fact that you can get such startlingly different films within a couple of months of each other defines the confused state of Bollywood today. What works, what doesn’t, is more than ever a matter of gamble, and right now, 2010 shows all signs of an industry that doesn’t know whether it’s coming or going.

On two successive rain-spattered days in Mumbai, a clutch of B-town heavy-hitters talk about where the film industry is at and where they think it is headed. There’s Karan Johar who has gone from popcorn romance to infidelity to gayness to disability and religious identity and is now back to a contemporary date flick (I Hate Luv Storys released this week). Rohan Sippy, who has braved a second-go-around with Hollywood studios after the debacle of his Chandni Chowk to China, co-produced with Warner Bros (Dum Maaro Dum releases early next year in tandem with Star Fox). Ekta Kapoor who broke the barrier with Love Sex aur Dhokha and is now busy ramping up her new production offshoot, Alt Entertainment (LSD was the first film from the fledgling company). And, of course, Anurag Kashyap, the quintessential outsider who’s attempting the straddle between art and commerce like no one has before (Udaan, which he has mentored and produced, was India’s official entry at the Cannes film festival and is out later this month).

I have my opening line ready when I meet Karan Johar in his spiffy office, his desk surrounded by trophies, a collection of healthy nibbles at hand. Closest to him is a bottle of plump almonds. I ask for coffee. He grins and says, I get that a lot. What I get, instead, is conversation with Karan, who is now contemplating a radical change for Dharma Productions: a film with new faces. This, from a filmmaker who has flagrantly and proudly declared his penchant for big stars, big films: “How long can we carry on making movies with the same nine stars ? We will die of exhaustion.”

He’s known what it is to be golden. And also what it is to be reviled. His huge Twitter following is full of people who fling all sorts of invective at him, and he says he can understand that “because a happy, shiny person like me can be irritating”. “Earlier I used to get upset, now I just ignore them”, he says. And block them off his feed. Now on a sabbatical from directing, Johar is setting into motion the process which will have four films out next year, reading a script a day (“85 out of 90 are terrible”), thinking of ways to encourage good writing (“I would give anything for a perfect screenplay”), and mentoring debutant directors in his stable (“it helps if you have Malhotra as your last name, it seems like a karmic connection!”; I Hate Luv Storys is by Punit Malhotra). Are all you budding filmmakers with that surname listening?
The one truism that comes through loud and clear through all this is that stars are no longer guarantors of success. A Brad Pitt or a Tom Cruise alone can’t rake it in anymore in Hollywood. Ditto for a Shah Rukh or a Salman in Bollywood. So is there a formula that will pull the industry out of the doldrums? The game is begging to be changed: who will be the game-changer?

“Greed and fear are the twin emotions that dictate us,” says Rohan Sippy, third generation Bollywood (grandfather GP began it all, and no one’s yet bested father Ramesh’s Sholay: it is at the top of every Best Bollywood film list), sounding like a wiser, smarter Gordon Gekko. “Because of the money having dried up, we are scared. The moment we have two hits on our hands, we will be back again doing the same thing. We need to be better behaved with each other,” he says.

Over a delicious home-cooked lunch of dal, stuffed bhindi and perfectly spherical tiny phulkis (father Ramesh joins us, and noting my delight says, she’s from Delhi, they only have large rotis there), the conversation veers towards how Bollywood has lost the ability to make films accessible to everyone. “Those were the skill sets that dad had, and Yash Chopra had,” says Sippy. “Only Raju (Rajkumar Hirani) is continuing that tradition, he is the Capra of our times. We need to get back to making great movies like we used to, those that connect us to sheer spectacle and drama. And we need to adopt new technology (yes, 3D, yes, digital),” he says.

After a dire course correction which involves re-structuring film finances, curbing greedy stars, rationalising distribution patterns (just because the multiplexes are there, doesn’t mean every film needs a 2000 screen release), ditching corporate profligacy and wasteful high-pitched marketing, ultimately it all comes down to the film.
“We thought we had everything in place for Chandni Chowk, but we didn’t get it right,” says Sippy, who is currently in the process of wrapping up the shoot on Dum Maaro Dum, a drug-buster film set in Goa. “ There is no other road map — you have to make a good film.”

So what’s Ekta Kapoor up to after making Love Sex Aur Dhoka? Her office, at 7 pm, is a beehive. Several aides hover, a potential painted K-serial wannabe waits nervously. The czarina of Balaji Telefilms escorts me in, the phalanx of garland-festooned gods and goddesses that fill a wall the perfect counterpoint to her red tilak-adorned forehead. A pale pink Ganesha is pushed to one side to make space for the voice recorder.
The moment she opens her mouth, though, all notions of fluffiness are dispelled: she’s sharp and observant, backed by an uncanny sense of what will work. “Just because I’ve made one kind of film till now (Balaji till now was identified with raunchy comedies like Kya Kool Hain Hum) doesn’t mean I can’t make something that’s totally different. That’s the whole point of Alt Entertainment,” she says. LSD is certainly alternative.

And edgy and dark in ways Balaji has not known how to be. “The moment Dibakar (Banerjee) narrated the story, I loved it,” she says. “I look around me, and I see it happening everywhere.”
Alt Entertainment will run on a cost-driven philosophy. “ We want to inhabit both ends of the spectrum— after LSD, our next film, from Balaji, Once upon a time in Mumbaai (out July end) is as commercial as commercial can get,” she says. Her team looks at the ‘feasibility pattern’ of new projects, and then it’s down to Kapoor to give the final nod. “All I want from a film is that it should engage me completely,” she says. And to see what people are watching, and liking, she catches a film every Sunday at a nearby multiplex.

It’s appropriate that Anurag Kashyap gets in the last word, because everyone I speak to brings up his name (Dibakar Banerjee’s follows in the same breath) as being hugely instrumental in pushing Bollywood out of its conventional rat-hole. When Kashyap began, he had no takers (his scintillating debut film Paanch is still unreleased, and it doesn’t look as if it’s ever going to see the light of day). Now, after Dev.D, he’s at a place where he’s no longer having to write dialogue for cheesy mainstream films to get by. He cranks open his laptop and shows me the ads he’s now doing for “bread and butter”: one of them has Shah Rukh prancing around a sleeping beauty.

But he, like the others, is wary of claiming game-changer status.”Dev.D was not a game-changer, it didn’t crack the box office in the way a Bheja Fry did”, he says, raising his voice to be heard over the din at hip suburban hangout Zenzi (the Rs 60 lakh-to-Rs 12 crore Bheja Fry story is now part of Bollywood lore). “I am no game-changer. Main change hotey huey game mein ek wheel ho sakta hoon ( I can be a wheel in a game that’s changing). Aamir (Khan) was a game-changer in the way he started doing one film a year, and is now taking the role of the actor-producer so seriously. Ranbir (Kapoor) can be a game-changer if he continues to pick the right roles. I am just the guy who will take your film from the paper to the theatre,” he says. Vikramaditya Motwane, director of Udaan, can vouch for that fact.

“The idea is to put the money back into the kind of films I believe in, and use it for a distribution venture with Ranjan”, he says. (Ranjan Singh, indie film marketer, whose first outing was the excellent Indian Ocean rockumentary Leaving Home). Singh, who is alongside, has been filling me up with all the new ways films with exciting, so-called “unsafe” content can be put out into theatres, and is all fired up about his next ventures, Makrand Deshpande’s Shah Rukh Bola Khoobsoorat Hai Tu, and Kashyap’s untitled next.

Kashyap recalls a visit home recently for his sister’s wedding, where his mother fished out an old letter: the 19-year-old Anurag, bursting with Technicolor dreams, had written that he would go to Bombay and change the way movies were being made, “Main filmon ko badal doonga”. He hasn’t really got all the way there, but now, when he gets an automatic mention anytime people talk about “different”, you know that he’s both a source of inspiration for the indie brigade, and envy for case-hardened industry vets, and that, in Bollywood, still surviving on mom-and pop-instincts despite all the talk of corporatising, is a big deal.

So, yes, there is acknowledgment that the game as it is being played at all kinds of levels, whether they are the smaller-budget, high concept movies or the monstrous tent-poles, needs drastic changing. But there’s no ready-made game-changer willing to take on the responsibility of the entire film industry. What we have at the moment are filmmakers ready to create shifts. The “golden period of our own” that Karan Johar is convinced is around the corner is still a way off. What the industry will have to hunt for, alongside its quest for its elusive chalice, is filmmakers who want simply to make a film, not a certified blockbuster from the get-go.

Go on, show us a movie. We will show you the money.

LINK

3:10 to Yuma – Crowe disappoints yet again!


Watched this film with so many great expectations - very few were met. The film started out as a standard tale of heartless monster outlaws and lawful upstanding men that vow to bring one of them, Wade (played by Russel Crowe), to justice. But it rapidly derailed into a politically correct farcical piece that ended most senselessly with the outlaw trying to uplift the honest man, decimating his own gang and voluntarily boarding a train to Yuma prison. What is wrong with that, you ask? Maybe he was ready to do penance for his sins, but the makers were not happy to even throw us that bone - they showed him whistling for his horse and the animal running alongside the train in an implied escape.

Along the way the Pinkerton man was shown to be a Bible thumper who killed three year old Apache children, the outlaw had so much appeal for the women, and could charm children too. There were no moments of real tension in the film, no character that pulled me in, the situations were extremely contrived and the last 30 minutes were cobbled together in a laughable manner.

Read more HERE

July 3, 2010

Miss Potter


Syrupy at times with enough chweetness to make you cringe but there is still a lot to like in this story of Beatrix Potter (played by Renee Zellweiger) - creator of the beloved Peter Rabbit. She is shown as a young but fiercely independent woman who paints and draws animals and weaves these magical characters into stories. Eventually a story is picked up by a publishing house run by the Warne family - mostly as a way to get an inexperienced brother out of their hair. This young publisher Norman Warne (Ewan McGregor) puts his all into getting the book published and makes Beatrix famous. The two misfits hit it off and are encouraged by Warne's sister Millie (Emily Watson). There is much opposition from Beatrix' family and the eventual tragic separation.

Read more HERE

Heat and Dust Anderson Style – Darjeeling Limited


The movie starts with a short film featuring Jason Schwartzman and Natalie Portman - it is well done but I could not see the point, maybe someone can explain that to me.

So I will skip to Part II - this thankfully had no Natalie Portman, instead it started with Bill Murray on a madcap hair-raising taxi ride through the town of Jodhpur to the train station to catch the Darjeeling Limited! He misses it but Adrien Brody (Peter) does manage to get on with his numerous bags. He joins his brother Jason Schwartzman (Jack) in a train suite and they wait for their brother Owen Wilson (Francis) to appear. Owen has planned a trip for them to discover their filial feelings and bond as brothers. The madcap journey involves praying at various shrines, having sex with the attractive train hostess who delivers nimbu-pani (lemonade) and savory snacks, drinking lots of cough syrup, consuming heavy duty pain killers, and opiate pain killers dispensed through a dropper, pepper spray and a snake bought at the local bazaar, and engaging in some "mind cleansing" ritual with peacock feathers and chants! The snake escapes, the pepper spray is injudiciously used and the trio with their 14 or so suitcases, a printer and a laminating machine are thrown off the train. Now they are on their own in the desert, trundling their suitcases along and fall into another adventure that involves saving some drowning boys, but not all are saved. A funeral is attended and a sojourn in the village does finally result in the much sought after bonding between the brothers. It is in fact ironic that the brothers who are new to India achieve some measure of peace and acceptance of each other, while the mother (Anjelica Huston) who has run away to a convent in India, actually runs away again to escape from her progeny who are visiting her!

The movie is exceedingly well done - the atmosphere is palpable, and one can almost smell the dust. India is shot au naturel with no glamor but is most appealing due to the personalities shown - some scintillating, some terse, others simply beautiful even when they do not speak much.....

Read more HERE

July 2, 2010

We are family- Theatrical Trailer




July 1, 2010

I Hate Luv Storys- All reviews here!


I Hate Luv Storys -- Film Review by The Hollywood Reporter
By Lisa Tsering


Bottom Line: Big-screen romance, Bollywood-style, is the star of this alluring story.

EMERYVILLE, Calif. -- Who knows the formula of a perfect love story better than the technicians who put them together every day?

The romantic comedy "I Hate Luv Storys," which takes place on the sets of a Bollywood musical, revolves around a cynical assistant director, Jay (Imran Khan), and a moony, sentimental set designer, Simran (Sonam Kapoor of "Saawariya"), at odds over the meaning of love and whether it's even necessary.

The considerable charm of its two leads, plus the allure of heartthrob Khan, bode well for the film at the boxoffice.

Khan plays Jay with an irresistible insouciance. An aspiring young filmmaker, Jay is happy to get a shot at working on a big-budget movie, but he is nauseated by the "filmi" cliches that make up the typical Bollywood spectacular: the farewell scene at the train station -- "If she turns around, that means she loves me," muses the hero -- the ubiquitous rain scene and the love song performed atop a snow-capped New Zealand mountain.

Simran, on the other hand, thinks Indian movie romance is a fine art -- and it's to Kapoor's credit that this graceful actress conveys a core intelligence despite Simran's willingness to wholeheartedly embrace the fantasy.

"Luv Storys" is packed with tongue-in-cheek references to such memorable Hindi films as "Dil Chahta Hai" and "Devdas" while poking gentle fun at the romantic classics produced or directed under "Luv Storys' " own banner, Dharma Prods.: "Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge," "Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham," "Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna" and "Kuch Kuch Hota Hai." Viewers familiar with Hindi films will find much to appreciate.

But the film breezily ignores one of the most significant cliches of Bollywood -- nepotism -- which seems particularly ironic because the film's director (debutant Punit Malhotra, nephew of costumer designer Manish Malhotra), Khan ( nephew of actor-director Aamir Khan) and Kapoor ( daughter of Anil Kapoor) have all gotten a lucky break.

But nepotism can only go so far, and Malhotra, Khan and Kapoor are naturally talented enough to deliver the goods. In one witty fantasy sequence, violins play in the background as the dashing Khan and radiant Kapoor -- in a chiffon sari, of course -- profess their love, proving that these two can swoon on a mountaintop with the best of them.

I am just an artist, not a politician


Asin is now shooting with Salman Khan in Colombo for Anees Bazmee's Ready remake from Telugu. It has set alarm bells ringing in Kollywood as any association with Sri Lanka is considered taboo in the industry.

The unit who were originally planning to shoot the film in Mauritius, changed locations at the last minute as the Sri Lankan Government rolled out the red carpet for Salman Khan who attended the IIFA.

Please note that a raging controversy was going on in Kollywood over Bollywood stars taking part in the recent IIFA Awards held in Colombo. The South Indian Film Chamber of Commerce (SIFCC) even passed a resolution banning the films of all the stars who went to Sri Lanka. Hrithik Roshan’s Kites was pulled off from Chennai screens as he attended IIFA.

Asin going to Colombo has raised a hue and cry by pro- Tamil groups, which will have its repercussions on Kavalkaran. Nadigar Sangam Secretary Radha Ravi in an interview has said: “Nadigar Sangam will be meeting to take a call on the Asin issue shortly.”

Following these developments, Asin in an exclusive interview spoke to Sridevi Sreedhar from Colombo.

You met the media in Sri Lanka? Please comment?
Yes, There was a press meet arranged by the film unit here and I explained my stand on the issue.

There is a raging controversy back home in Tamil Nadu on your decision to shoot for Ready in Sri Lanka. Please comment.
I am just an actress. A leading lady doesn’t have a say in deciding the shooting location of a film. That is the call of the producer and director I did express my concern to them but the final call rests with them. I am just doing my work, being professional and honouring the commitment I had made to the makers of the film.

What is your take on the issue?
I feel that art is something that brings people together and promotes peace. It’s something that is positive. The Tamil population in Sri Lanka have really supported and encouraged my films and work. I take this as an opportunity to reach out to them and meet them. In these difficult times that they have been through, if that brings a smile on their faces that’s the least that I can do.

Do you think that the whole issue is highly politicised?
I would leave politics to politicians. I am just an artist not a politician and would not like to be dragged into any controversy. Last month, our Indian cricket team played for Asia cup in Sri Lanka and on Sunday, Indian Navy chief Admiral Nirmal Verma arrived in Colombo for a five-day official tour. There are six flights from Chennai to Sri Lanka and hundreds of Indian tourists are coming to Sri Lanka every day. I am here to do my job and I feel that sports and art should not be politicised.

Did you meet the Tamil population and your fans in Sri Lanka?
Yes. Tamil population has always encouraged my work. They were so happy to see me and my interaction with them brought a smile on their faces.

http://sify.com/movies/tamil/fullstory.php?id=14947695

June 30, 2010

Udaan (Music review), Hindi – Amit Trivedi

Thanks to Neo who posted this on KP !



Aazaadiyan’s harmonious vocals, wrapped in true rock style, take flight mid-way beautifully; the track has wonderful lyrics by Amitach Bhattacharya and equally good vocals by himself, the composer and Neuman Pinto. Geet mein is Amitabh’s show again, even as that classic rock base gorgeously invokes many rock Gods, while both the Amits sing their heart out! Kahaani has breathtaking guitar work all through…and oh…those lyrics again, courtesy Amitabh! Joi Barua and Neuman Pinto’s singing starts at an unconventional point and builds on the tune in a bewitching way! Motumaster’s lyrics, by Anurag Kashyap, indicate right at the beginning its spoofy mood! With outlandish rhymes, the words are the only thing going for this nautanki-style number; tune-wise it is ordinary. Naav’s orchestration, when it introduces itself, after the prelude, is enough to knock you down. Mohan’s rustic vocals add to it and make for a delightful combo. Nadi mein bears a strong echo of Amit’s debut, Aamir, and blends itself into the ‘Ek hulchul si’ mode from Dev.D soon, all the while creating a compelling sound. The theme piece too is fascinatingly composed, with it’s heart-tugging combination of piano and violin! A knock-out, yet again, from one of India’s most promising composers!

Here is the theatrical trailer of the movie releasing on July 16th:

June 29, 2010

Ranbir teams up with Shammi; John in trouble, Aamir in Bombay Velvet?



The team of Imtiaz Ali’s Rockstar is all ready to start shooting in July. Ranbir Kapoor, as always, is taking his role very seriously and has been prepping for months. So much so, he is even learning to play the guitar for the role. Grand uncle Shammi Kapoor will also be working in the project and but naturally Ranbir is super excited about it. In the past, Shammi has worked with Ranbir’s father Rishi Kapoor and now it’s the young scion’s chance to face the camera with the dancing star of yesteryears.

LINK

John Abraham has been facing a lot of bad luck where his movies are concerned. Three of his completed films Hook Ya Crook, 1-800-Love and Aashayein are stuck with no sign of imminent release. What John is really banking on is Race 2 and Dostana 2 to resurrect his career. We know it won’t be long before the hunk bounces back.

LINK

Aamir is sole lead in Bombay Velvet according to the latest from Anurag Kashyap in DNA!!!

Faridoon_S

"We feel Aamir has the intensity and the depth to shoulder the movie all alone":Anurag Kashyap in 2day's DNA on Bombay Velvet 22 minutes ago via mobile web

Faridoon Shahryar Faridoon_S

"Shahrukh is a nice actor but this film is tailormade for Aamir":Anurag on rumors of Aamir n SRK both being in Bombay Velvet. 19 minutes ago via mobile web

A cliched thought with a twist



PUNIT MALHOTRA, Manish Malhotra’s nephew, takes guard as director this friday with the Imran-Sonam rom com

Two days to go before the world watches your first film. Excited or nervous?

Numb... numb... I feel numb. It’s kind of crazy because a lot of stuff is happening. I am looking at every day as a different workday and trying to distance myself from preview reactions. They are all good reactions. The idea is not to go mad and stay calm.

And to think you wanted to be a movie star and ended up becoming a director!

Yes, that’s correct. I did want to become an actor and I still do. I Hate Luv Storys was a subject I had written and I was very passionate about making it. I didn’t want someone else to direct my script. I was clear if it had to be made, I would make it. That’s pretty much it. And in the past one year I have given my all into this. Also, I have had the best year of my life. No matter how many ups and downs we have had, I don’t regret anything.

Did you write the script with Punit Malhotra in mind?

No, no, I wrote it with Imran in mind. And I still believe that there’s nobody better than him for the role of Jai in the film. His body language, the way he talks, his belief in cinema... he is just the correct person.

What about Sonam?

Not as much as Imran. Sonam came in midway during the scripting. It was Manish’s suggestion and I kept her in mind while writing the rest of the script. When I met Sonam, I was shocked how she fit the character like hand in glove. She was so perfect. So yes, I was lucky to get both my first choices.

The story of a guy who hates love stories falling in love with a girl who loves romantic movies...what’s your inspiration?

It’s actually a very cliched thought. Every hero in Hindi film tries to be the cool guy and say “I don’t believe in love” and every heroine is always mushy. I wanted to make that story with a twist to it. I wanted to throw the guy in a world where he has to like love stories.

What about you? Do you hate love stories?

I have grown up with them. I love them. I love Bollywood love stories. They are superb. It’s the best way to spend three hours. You always come out with a smile. Apart from that, if you are talking about reality, I don’t think it happens.

Is IHLS like the Karan Johar film of yore?

Ummm... It is a Karan Johar film done in a completely different way. It’s a little different from his world because it is mocking the kind of films he used to make. It’s a lot of him, it’s a lot of me, it’s a nice blend.

Will you now star in a KJo production or direct more films for him?

The idea is to first release IHLS, hope it does well, to follow that and then I don’t know what will happen. If I get a good role, why not? But there’s also another script I am working on. Whatever works out... but it has to be in the movies. That’s my first love. And I am even ready to become an assistant (to Karan Johar) again.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100630/jsp/entertainment/story_12625837.jsp

The last airbender controversy, in m. night shyamalan's own words



With The Last Airbender opening in theaters in just a few days, everybody wants to know what director M. Night Shyamalan has to say about the fan controversy surrounding the race of movie's key characters.

During a recent media event, an interviewer asked him about it... and Manoj, um, kind of lost it: M Night Shyamalan in his own words on The Last Airbender race controversy. I found this kind of interesting:

There are four nations, and I had to eventually make a decision about what nationality each of them are. What happened was, Noah Ringer walked in the door – and there was no other human being on the planet that could play Aang except for this kid. To me, he felt mixed race with an Asian quality to him. I made all the Air nomads mixed race – some of them are Hispanic, some of them are Korean. Every monk you see in a flashback, in that world, are all mixed race because they're nomadic. I felt that really worked as a culture. OK, so that's one-quarter of our world population. The second group is the Fire Nation; when Dev was cast as Zuko, I said, OK, I have to cast an Uncle Iroh that looks like his uncle. We're going to go from Indian/Persian to Mediterranean, all that group with all its darker colors including Italians.

So now we're at one-half of the population of the movie which is not white.

Moving on to the third group, which is the Earth kingdom (which is the biggest kingdom in this fictional world): I liked a bunch of the people who happened to be Japanese, Korean, Philippine, so I decided to make the Earth kingdom Asians. Now we're at three-quarters of the world. Now I have the brother and sister left. If you don't have an edict of "don't put white people in the movie" then the Water tribe can be European/Caucasian. So that's how it ended up.

Here's the irony of the conversation: The Last Airbender is the most culturally diverse movie series of all time. I'm not talking about maybe one Jedi, maybe one person of a different color – no one's even close. That's a great pride to me. The irony of this statement enrages me to the point of ... not even the accusation, but the misplacement of it. You're coming at me, the one Asian filmmaker who has the right to cast anybody I want, and I'm casting this entire movie in this color blind way where everyone is represented. I even had one section of the Earth kingdom as African American, which obviously isn't in the show, but I wanted to represent them, too!

To be fair, from reading this, it does sound like Shyamalan actually put quite a bit of thought it into creating what was, in his mind, "the most culturally diverse movie series of all time." The problem is, this vision for the movie, and the resulting cast, stands in conflict with a lot of fans' fundamental understanding and appreciation of the source material.
More HERE

Give him a big round of applause - Caulfield tops his class!



Yes a little bird told me our very own Caulfield finished at the top of his class! Hard work paid off. Congratulate him guys! And if you are in his neighborhood, go have some mithai - eat my share too!

June 28, 2010

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1



Shabana Azmi: "Javed doesn’t have a single romantic bone in his body"


Shabana Azmi on the men who make her world and the woman who rules it. Filmfare gets to know the inner circle.

Her whacky film It’s A Wonderful Afterlife has introduced a new genre in India (similar to the Ealing comedies in England in the 1940s, which included social comment with horror). While her performance as the Punjabi Mrs Sethi has been widely appreciated, she was initially wary about doing it. “I told Gurinder, ‘You’ll have to lead me by the finger’. She took me to a baby shower in London where I met a lot of Punjabi women. Mrs Sethi is obsessed about getting her 30-year-old daughter (Goldy Notay) married. But the daughter is rejected because she is fat. Mrs Sethi kills the people who reject her who then return as spirits. But you never see her killing them. It’s basically brand Gurinder Chadha — whacky, funny and somewhere touches a chord,” she asserts.

The actor and activist, who always debunked stereotypes, says she was ‘never pressured’ into getting married. “But my mother was extremely concerned as I was already 34. It was never a problem with my father (the late poet Kaifi Azmi). Unka bas chalta toh main unhi ke paas rehti (if he had his way, he’d have kept me forever). He was too happy to have me at home.” Cutting to the now she adds, “I am not obsessed about our daughter (filmmaker Zoya Akhtar) getting married. If we were to tell her that we are worried about her she’d think we’ve gone loony,” she smiles.

It’s been eight years since Shabana lost her father, the late poet and writer Kaifi Azmi but she finds his existence all-pervasive. “Abba’s presence around me is so strong that I don’t miss him. I refer to him; I converse with him, more so when I am working in Mijwan (a village in Uttar Pradesh which was being developed by Kaifi Azmi). I remember him with joy, not sorrow. I was shaken after his death but my brother Baba (Azmi, cinematographer) helped me by saying, ‘Look at what this man has done, you should remember him with joy’. Abba is my lamppost, my guru, my friend and my reference point. He remains everything he was. And the fact that we continue to stage Kaifi Aur Main (a play on his life adapted from Yaad Ki Rehguzar written by Shaukat Azmi) with Javed playing Kaifi, his presence becomes stronger. Javed’s poem on Abba titled Ajeeb Aadmi Tha epitomises him.” She recites the lines emotionally,“Ajeeb aadmi tha woh (He was a strange man),Mohabbaton ka geet tha, bagaawaton ka rang tha (He was the song of love, the colour of rebellion), Kabhi woh sirf phool tha, kabhi woh sirf aag tha (A flower sometimes, sometimes just fire),Ajeeb aadmi tha woh (He was a strange man).”

Her mother Shaukat has also been an equally potent influence in her life. “A few years ago, I was at a demonstration for Nivara Haq (an organisation that fights for the rights of slum dwellers) and got arrested, I had to perform in the play Tumhari Amrita that evening at the NCPA. My mother went up to the audience and said, ‘Shabana is an actor but also an activist. She has been arrested and we are trying to get her released’. She went to the police and pleaded with them saying, ‘She’s an artiste, she has a commitment. Let her go and perform. I will bring her back and you can put her behind bars again’. That’s the commitment I have grown up with,” narrates Shabana, the fire obvious in her tone.

Being a poet’s beloved and wife are generally considered to be diametric realities but not so in her case. “Many young girls with stars in their eyes tell me, ‘Javed saab writes so beautifully. How romantic it must be to have him as a husband’. I tell them, ‘Please…he doesn’t have a single romantic bone in his body’.” To this Javed says, ‘If I were a trapeze artiste, does it mean that I will hang ulta (upside down) at home all the time? What you do for a profession you don’t do at home’.” On a serious note she says, “Javed is the person I expected him to be — intelligent, supportive, humorous and sharing the same worldview. He can be completely irreverent and terribly passionate about something too. After the way I revered my father, it was a tough act for any man to be my husband. But Javed has measured up to him in every way. Because he is a true feminist just the way my father was.”

As an allusion to her latest film, I ask her whether she believes in an ‘afterlife’. “Not at all, aapki jannat, aapki dozakh yahin hai (your heaven and hell are all here)!”

Farhana Farook

http://www.filmfare.com/articles/shabana-azmi-javed-doesnt-have-a-single-romantic-bone-in-his-body-1118.html

Man Movies?

By Mayank Shekhar

Forced to see too many chick flicks because of your significant other? Take revenge with these man movies.

Bollywood

Ram Gopal Varma’s Satya: This gang-war gem, to me, stands tall, right alongside the Godfather trilogy and Martin Scorsese’s finest mob operas. So gritty and real, you can actually smell the sweaty men of Mumbai’s mafia. It’s a bummer that despite Bollywood’s fixation with gangsters, nothing’s come even close to this work of art – Vishal Bhardwaj’s Maqbool was probably a distant second.

Farhan Akhtar’s Dil Chahta Hai: This film gifted to India the metrosexual man: single, city-bred, emotionally soft but not sissy, clean-shaven, dressed fit, hair spiked. Movies in Bollywood may or may not have changed since. The urban Indian man certainly began to look different after.

Rajkumar Santoshi’s Andaaz Apna Apna: There are only two questions that baffle you about this film: How could this craziest, male-bonding, super low-brow, comic masterpiece, with the nation’s top superstars, bomb at the cinemas on its release? And how, exactly, does Crime Master Gogo plan to play goti (marbles) with your eyeballs? The second question’s the easier one to figure.

Kundan Shah’s Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro: Hot editor simultaneously plays two photo-journos. Eager boys go where few men have been before – not to the ed’s bed, but through the city’s posh underbelly: among sold-out bureaucrats, the builder lobby et al. It’s mildly suggestive that the most serious film on the monumentally corrupt India of the ’80s should turn out to be among the finest comedies of cinema ever.

Kanti Shah’s GundA: Set somewhere between a dockyard and the countryside, where rape’s the national sport; all characters rhyme their speech; each is a moron, unique to world cinema: Chuttiya on ‘Vitamin Sex’, Bulla, Natte, Pote, Chikna… Super-star Shankar sets them right. Boys across engineering schools are known to watch this Mithun masterpiece many times over, on shared networks. They apparently sense science in its screenplay, something lay viewers are unable to fully appreciate.

World cinema

Sidney Lumet’s Serpico and Dog Day Afternoon: One’s a crackling, conflicted police drama that reminds you wholly of Govind Nihalani’s Ardh Satya. The other’s a stunning hostage piece that turns into a media circus. Both star an early Al Pacino, the ultimate male icon.

Oliver Stone’s Born On The Fourth Of July and Wall Street: Wars, in movies or otherwise, are about old men talking, and young men dying. Born… taught us another important American lesson: Tom Cruise can act. Wall Street of course let us in on an altogether separate chapter on reading films: We selectively take from movies whatever the hell we want. Gordon Gekko (Michael Douglas) was Wall Street’s grossest villain. He turned out to be the male, go-getter’s unparalleled role model: Greed is good ‘n’ all. Say that again if you’re still an investment banker.

Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner: Male geek gods never quite grow up. This is not a surprise, given sci-fi wizardry (Star Wars) and netherworld fantasies (Lord Of The Rings) are their only reality checks. I’m not the world’s hugest obsesso of the genre, so I know Blade Runner’s the best ever: it can spin my head over, surely it can do a lot more things to others.

Sergio Leone’s The Good, The Bad, The Ugly: All guns, gruffly machismo, silly lines made to sound all-important, and not even a half-written girl character in sight. This is, at its best, the primary, plotless Western: a genre that in itself, across the world, is tailor-made for men alone. How many women have you met who obsessively swear by Sholay? None that I know of.

Bernardo Betrolucci’s Last Tango In Paris: “What is this,” she asks, pointing to his naked body part. “It’s a man’s penis,” he says, “And a woman’s happiness.” He’s a middle-aged, meditative Marlon Brando; she, the gorgeous Maria Schneider. The two anonymously make unconditional love in Paris, with pleasure, without guilt: delicious, equally disturbing, and anything but juvenile porn.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/cinema-news/cinemascope/Watch-this-space/Article1-563505.aspx

June 27, 2010

Agneepath will be a period film!



Karan Johar attempts to remake his father's flopped film! Should one mess with cult films?

Super sugary chat with Abhi-Aish....



Haters please do not come after me, that is the title of the piece that goes on to mention diabetes etc.:

Bridge that missing link - i.e. show advance previews to press!!



Absence of advance screenings of Bollywood films leave journalists in US with no option but to accept PR material and work on them

Aseem Chhabra

Two weeks ago a group of journalists, gathered at Cisco’s office space in Manhattan for the global press day for Mani Ratnam’s Raavan. Using a new technology Tele-Presence, Cisco connected the film’s director and actors with journalists in Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai, Dubai and New York.


I walked into the small conference room and was blown away with the new technology. I have participated in video conference calls, but this was remarkable. We sat facing three giant screens. Abhishek and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan were in Mumbai in the middle screen, while Ratnam and Vikram were in Chennai on the left. More important, the technology had erased the distances. It seemed as if the stars and the other journalists were in the same room, right in front of us.

Cisco’s Tele-Presence press conference for Raavan in New York
Maria Giovanna

There was a lot of friendly banter with general questions, such as whether the Bachchans discuss work when they get home or what was it like working with Ratnam? Finally one reporter asked Ratnam “What is Raavan about?” Ratnam’s response was “Haven’t you seen the preview?” Yes, the reporter had seen the preview, but nobody had seen the film, which explained the mostly superficial conversation.

Bollywood production houses do not hold advance screenings of their films and it is somewhat understandable. There is a concern that bloggers and others who moonlight as critics on social media sites may post negative reviews and thereby ruin a film’s chance of finding its audience in its opening weekend.

But that is where the production houses have to work at winning the confidence of journalists. In the US the concept of review embargoes works as film journalists almost always respect the guidelines. In fact, most PR firms insist that reporters have to attend the advance screenings before they can interview the film-makers. It helps the level of reporting, especially the feature articles that focus on film-making.

Lately more and more Bollywood stars and film-makers are travelling to New York to promote their films, but at each situation reporters accept the general public relations material that is fed to them. There is a lot of excitement having a star like Shah Rukh Khan or Hrithik Roshan in our presence, but no reporter is prepared to ask specific questions about how and why certain scenes were written, acted, directed or shot.

There is access to Bollywood personalities in India and also here and yet there is hardly any intelligent conversation. The general discourse on Bollywood cinema is missing. Perhaps the producers and distributors like to keep the mystery about their films, but ultimately the audience loses out.

Last year Nikhil Advani told the press in New York that the soul of Chandni Chowk to China lay in the interactions between Mithun Chakraborty and Akshay Kumar. That evening I attended the film’s premiere – the first screening of CCTC and was surprised as I recounted Advani’s claims. The scenes between Chakraborty and Kumar were flat, lacking any emotional punch. I would have liked to talk further with Advani about the film he claimed was going to be the first crossover hit. But after the screening he was not available to the press.

There are some film personalities who continue talking about their films after the release. Karan Johar does not get tired sending out weekly Twitter updates that MNIK is doing well in various international markets. But that is a rare example. At the Raavan press day, Abhishek was exuberantly chatting with the reporters, but in the aftermath of the film’s debacle at the box office, he disappeared for a few days from Twitter, leaving his father to defend the film.

This week I received a screening invite for director Anusha Rizvi’s Peepli Live from a New York-based PR firm. Aamir Khan will be in New York in late July to talk to the press. The screening will enable journalists to have an open conversation with Khan about the film, his role as a producer and the reasons why he backed Peepli Live. It should only help the film as well as the audience.

LINK